Military Data Shows Problem, And It Is Getting Worse

SPRINGFIELD, Va. –  It’s not exactly clear why America’s military personnel are becoming fatter. May be that 15 decades of war have weakened the focus on fitness. Could be that millennials, with their penchant for activities such as some time and playing video games on networking, aren’t always up to the rigors of army life. Could be all of the burgers, pies, cakes and fries served in chow halls all over the world.
And also, the army is reflecting the nation population, whose the alarming increase obesity prices are being fueled by poor eating habits.
This is clear, though: Today’s army is fatter than ever.
For the first time in years, the Pentagon has disclosed information indicating the amount of troops its deems overweight, raising questions about readiness, fitness and the health of the force.
About 7.8 percent of the military — approximately one in every 13 soldiers — is clinically overweight, defined by a body mass-index over 25.   This rate has crept up since 2001, when it was only 1.6 percent, or one in 60, according to Defense Department data acquired by Military Times. And it’s highest among older service members, blacks, Hispanics and women.

In comparison with all the U.S. civilian population, the rate of overweight troops is far smaller. About 70% of the adult American population is clinically overweight or obese, according to information from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.
Defense Department health officials released the data from the Military Times after multiple requests. They didn’t provide data to show the rate of troops that are obese specifically within Navy, the Army, Air Force and Marine Corps.

Battle troops are becoming fatter. On average are not as likely to be obese since the force in the large. Back in 2001, only around 1 in every 100 service members assigned to combat livelihood fields that were arms was flagged to be obese. It’s about one in 15.

This disclosure comes at a time when Pentagon health officials are rewriting forcewide guidelines for body composition standards for officially assessing it, and the methods. For troops, a diagnosis contribute to separation or of obesity may stall a career, so these coverages are central to army life.

Some Pentagon officials say the mounting signs of obesity are nothing to be worried about.   Still others state obesity may be a life-and-death issue on the battlefield. Troops may not proceed as quickly making them easier targets. And if they’re wounded, it is challenging for their buddies to pull them.

“If I have to climb up to the top of a mountain in Nuristan, in Afghanistan, and if I have somebody who is classified as clinically obese, they are possibly going to be a liability for me on this patrol,” said Army Command Sgt. Maj. John Troxell, the army’s top noncommissioned officer and the senior enlisted advisor to Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford.  

Troxell said the force of today is ready, but he believes the trends demand consideration and are upsetting.

“I don’t think it’s a clear openness concern at the moment.   However, I think it. And we really have to look across our solutions in what we’re doing daily or every day to prepare the men and women for what might be the worst day of the life,” Troxell said in a recent meeting.

Top Pentagon health officials say the increase is nothing. Dr. Terry Adirim, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for health services policy and oversight, suggested there could, in actuality, be no real growth in obesity. She called it a “quote-unquote increase” and said that the data may just reflect that army physicians are more mindful of obesity and for that reason flagging it frequently in official health records.

“A physician who’s now more aware about nutrition and fitness, they may be diagnosing it over previous years. … You can not tell from these numbers precisely what it is that is accounting for these apparent increases,” Adirim explained.
The obesity data is derived for physical fitness assessments from medical documents, not the until-level analyzing of the functional force.   Adirim emphasized comparisons to the population to the far higher obesity rates and rejected any concerns. “I am not concerned about these numbers representing problems with openness or fitness,” she explained. “In fact, I feel great that our military service members are well below the general populace when it comes to BMI measurement that are overweight and fat.”
Health officials caution against placing too much focus in human anatomy scores, which evaluate an individual’s height and weight to flag individuals who might have unhealthy levels of body fat.

The BMI measurement can be called a blunt instrument that erroneously defines body builders with heavy muscle mass as being obese, and misses flabby and unfit men and women who have been possess lanky body types.  
“You cannot extrapolate directly to state, because a BMI may be higher, that individual subsequently is unhealthy and therefore they will not be prepared for battle,” said Dr. Donald Shell, the Pentagon’s director of Disease Prevention, Disease Management and Population Health Policy and Oversight office.

The latest Pentagon obesity info validates concerns raised by “Mission: Preparation,” a nonprofit group of over 600 retired military officers that work to strengthen national security by advocating for kids nationally to have great schools and good eating habits.   Obesity is atop the schedule of the group. Studies indicate that about 70 percent of adolescents aren’t qualified for military service, and failure is a leading cause.

“This is about the national security of the United States,” said retired Army Lt. Gen. John Bednarek, who had been the highest ranking American general in Iraq at 2014. “it is a long term trend and we can’t turn a blind eye.   The main point is that our commanders and senior leaders need to have a peek at what we are serving, whether it’s at the [dining facility] or aboard a boat in the mess.   Are we providing healthy choices? Are we providing fruits and vegetable options up front? Rather than the first thing they see in the morning is that the grill using a 22-grams-of-fat sausage patty?”

New Coverage in the Functions  

The BMI metric is a key dilemma for the Pentagon’s current review of its forcewide body composition policy, the first time in 14 years that officials’ve rewritten these rules.
For troops, the official assessment of body composition begins with the BMI test to find out whether their height and weight remain healthy. If a fantastic BMI is shown by troops, they pass the body composition evaluation. Should they fail, they must undergo a much more complete “tape test” to estimate actual body fat percentage.
The policy requires service members to maintain body fat levels below a key threshold — 28 percent for men and 36 per cent for girls. And for years the Pentagon has demanded the services to apply that using a notoriously low-tech “tape evaluation.” Failure is often recorded in official personnel records and may impact advertising prospects. Failures could result in involuntary separation.

Many troops are critical of the BMI and the tape tests, which could punish people with specific body types.

Top military health plan to release a new policy this year that may have a sweeping impact on the military defines and measures wellness and exercise.